Different Drummer: Hugo Weaving
The Rainmakers - "Reckoning Day"
The Offspring - "Disclaimer"
Sepultura - "Politricks"
The Roots - "False Media"
Queensryche - "Revolution Calling"
Ken Hensley - "Proud Words"
Living Colour - "Cult of Personality"
Megadeth - "Symphony of Destruction"
Dead Kennedys - "California Uber Alles"
Dead Kennedys - "We've Got a Bigger Problem Now"
XTC - "The Ugly Underneath"
Jean Sibelius - "Finlandia"
Elvis Costello - "Less Than Zero"
Sheryl Crow - "Hard to Make a Stand"
Sonic Youth - "Youth Against Fascism"
Devo - "Enough Said"
The Rainmakers - "Spend It On Love"
Gameplan for upcoming Inappropriate Conversations
These are times that call for the sound of music:
- The sound of Protest
- The sound of Resistance
- The sound of Opposition
- The sound of Disorder
- The sound of Dissent
- The sound of Sustainability
Inappropriate Conversations podcast, long promo
Inappropriate Conversations podcast, short promo
When you don't know the rest of the story, it can be challenging to tell the part that you do know.
"Earth has no sorrow that heaven cannot heal."
Different Drummer: Alain Robbe-Grillet
Dubious as I am of boycotts, I'm already refusing to do business with Pharisees. Let's face it: most boycotts publicly proclaimed by the "religious right" are refusals to shop at stores or watch TV shows that those same people have previously refused to frequent multiple times before. It's an adulterous understanding of the concept. In a more personal but dedicated way, though, I have made good on past promises to withdraw my support from companies that treated me like a second-class citizen. In an era where our last remaining vote may be our pocketbooks, I may have to increase my resolve to avoid any dealings with companies that would shun customers or fire employees because of who they are or whom they love.
Different Drummer: Gregg Popovich
The current political climate is presenting more threats to individual liberty. A fair amount of threats are disguised as efforts to protect "religious liberty" coming from state legislatures, several court jurisdictions, and perhaps soon the executive branch of the federal government. The "liberty" being sought is the power to refuse service to customers, fire employees, or worse.
None of the fervently desired permissions to discriminate have anything to do with the behavior of those customers or employees in those roles within our economy and society. It's not about the customers who cost more money to do business with than the business can cover with profit margins. It's not about employees who fail to get the job done because of what otherwise would be described as the way they live their lives outside of work. It is truly about a false piety on the part of so-called Christian citizens seeking to redefine "religious liberty" to give them the power to impose an earthly judgment on people they perceive as living out sins that Jesus wants them to hate.
I've spoken elsewhere about the core theological questions, going all the way back to Inappropriate Conversations #20 (including the poem "Chapter And Verse") if not further back than that. When it comes to personal piety, "love the sinner but hate the sin" is an abomination, not what the Lord requires of us. "Love the Lord and your neighbor" is the sum of the Law, and Jesus reminded us of this repeatedly.
What this trend represents is a betrayal of Christianity by the "religious right" and other politically-active Christians. It represents a betrayal of our free market economy by giving an inappropriate veto power to something other than the laws of supply and demand. And, clearly, it threatens and thereby betrays all LGBTQIA people and anyone else these inept business leaders want to exclude for not being good enough to get into their heaven, and so not being good enough to shop or work in their stores or companies.
The next Inappropriate Conversations will be called "No Pharisee Shopping Spree" and it will explore how the rest of us -- including those who are far more committed to following Christ than this group of Christians -- can respond to protect people who are clearly assessed as "the least of these" by many of today's politicians, legislators, judges, etc.
It won't look like a boycott. This isn't going to be another pointless public proclamation about "not watching the Oscars this year" from people who haven't watched an Academy Awards telecast in years if not decades. We know they haven't paid the award shows any attention because they scream "not this year" on social media every single year.
No, it is likely to take a different form, perhaps more measured but certainly more Walk than Talk.
For now, I'm calling it a Consumer & Employee Freedom Protection Action, but slogans are unimportant. What matters more is aggressively standing up for people who should not have their livelihood threatened because they aren't willing to lie to the rest of (as, to be fair, was required of them for centuries) about who they are and whom they love.
I might go so far as to suggest that a day of evil is upon us. When people who publicly proclaim that they are Christians are so far away from Christ that their cherished solutions are little more than a means of bullying marginalized people into telling lies, then we can look to what Jesus said about "the father of all lies" and safely determine that we can know who the new Pharisees are.
"When the day of evil comes, we must be able to stand our ground; and, after we have done everything, to stand."
(Paul of Tarsus, paraphrased)